Home Blog Page 21

Ghana’s democracy under seige as armed military men storm parliament

Ghana’s democracy has been shocked after armed military men stormed the country’s parliament during its dissolution on the dawn of Thursday, January 7, 2021.

The military entered the parliament due to misunderstanding between the New Patriotic Party (NPP) and the National Democratic Congress (NDC) during the dissolution of the 7th parliament of the 4th republic.

Check This Out: Zylofon FM shut down after mask men threatened to kill Blakk Rasta on air

 

A chant of songs from the NDC Members of Parliament elect  sent the military out of the chambers of the parliament

The Incident

The incident got to do with the decision by the NPP MPs elect, to show their ballots cast for the position of the Speaker of Parliament.

The NDC said the behaviour of the NPP was constitutionalised hence would not allow that to happen.

The situation brought the vote to a standstill for almost two hours.

The voting was restarted after 4:30 am.

Zylofon FM shut down after mask men threatened to kill Blakk Rasta on air

1

Zylofon FM,an Accra based radio station has been shut down after a masked man entered the premises of the radio station threatening to kill Blakk Rasta.

The incident which occured on Tuesday, January 5,2021 whilst Blakk Rasta was on air,let to the shut down of the station.

According to a tweet by Black, the police has invaded the premises to ensure his safety.

 

Screenshot 20210105 185114

Supreme Court quashes Ho High Court order against John Amewu

The Supreme Court has quashed an order of the Ho High which placed an injunction on the gazetting of the NPP MP-elect for Hohoe, Mr John Peter Amewu.

The apex court has also quashed another order by the Ho High Court which placed an injunction on the EC from presenting Mr Amewu to parliament as MP -elect for Hohoe

This decision by the court followed a certiorari application filed by the Attorney -General.

In a unanimous decision today, a five -member panel of the apex court held that the Ho High Court had no jurisdiction to grant the two orders.

According to the court, the orders by the court were in the nature of parliamentary election petition, but the original case which led to the orders were a human rights violation case and therefore the Ho High Court had no jurisdiction.

Consequently, the court quashed all the proceedings on December 23, 2002 during which the Ho High Court, presided over by Justice George Buadi granted those two interim orders

The Supreme Court , however, declined to prohibit Justice Buadi from hearing the rest of the case which relates to the alleged human rights violations

Increase our ex-gratia before we approve package for Executive – MPs demand

0

Members of Parliament have declined to approve the ex-gratia package for members of the executive arm of government until President Akufo Addo increases their own package as contained in the Prof. Yaa Ntiamoah Badu Report.

The MPs at a closed-door meeting Monday night demanded that the President issues a white paper varying the emolument as contained in the report before the House approves the benefits of the Executive.

The five-member committee set up in June determined the salaries, benefits and end of service packages for President, Vice President, Speaker of Parliament, Supreme Court Judges, Ministers, Deputy Ministers, Auditor-General, Commission Chairpersons among others.

The President is expected to approve that of MPs and other Article 71 officeholders whilst Parliament approves that of the Executive.

But the MPs have expressed disappointment that their take-home back pay plus end of service benefit as contained in the report did not meet the minimum threshold of GHC600,000 that was paid to ordinary MPs in the 6th Parliament.

Sources say the committee’s recommendation put MPs at the bottom of the ladder below the Executive and even the Judiciary.

The Committee’s report recommends that the MPs take home an end-of-service benefit of four months of their salary for every year that they served in the Legislature but they want that increased.

Parliament has today, (Tuesday) to take a second look at portions of the committee’s report spelling out the emoluments of officials of the Executive arm of government and approve it before Parliament dissolves on Wednesday.

Source: Kasapa FM

It is time the Supreme Court must shine with Integrity – Dr Lawrence

The Founder of the Diaspora Progressive Movement in USA , Dr Lawrence has said that Ghana’s Supreme Court judges must use the current Election cases brought before them as a yardstick to protect their integrity and to propagate a positive atmosphere that will convince Ghanaians to restore the hope they once had in the judicial system.

According to him, it was time for the supreme court to shine in the discharge of theyr duties.

Dr lawrence argued that One of the greatest challenges in Africa is how we conduct and declare our Presidential elections and results respectively.

According to him, It has become so corrupt that, it is normal that once a flawed and illegitimate President is declared a winner, the status quo is observed.

“This is why I called on the Supreme Court of Ghana to shine and overturn the status quo legally.” He said.

Read his statement below:

 

 

Dr. Lawrence writes:
It’s time for the Supreme Court to Shine

One of the most greatest challenges in Africa is how we conduct and declare our Presidential elections and results respectively. It has become so corrupt that, it is normal that once a flawed and illegitimate President is declared a winner, the status quo is observed. This is why I called on the Supreme Court of Ghana to shine and overturn the status quo legally.

As soon as the Presidential results were declared on December 9 2020, the NDC came out and rejected that flawed results. No wonder, the following day, EC Chair, Mrs Jean Mensah came out and changed the figures but maintained that the percentages didn’t change. It was very clear that the 51% for Nana Addo and 47% for John Mahama were plugged figures and Jean Mensah was looking for figures to match those percentages, regardless of the figures on the original pink sheets.

The NPP started chanting “go to court, go to court, go to court”
What has motivated the NPP to chant “to go court” is that they believe once the declaration is done, it is final, and that no court will attempt to overturn the declared results. This is the status quo.

NDC is in court and what has motivated them to go to court is the constitutional powers given to the pink sheet to resolving election disputes. They are also motivated by the case of Kenya and Malawi, where the Supreme Court overturned the status quo and declared a run-off which were eventually won by the opposition leader.

Africa is crying for the time when Presidential elections are held free and fair and all who helped to cheat are jailed. Today, some African countries are hailing Kenya and Malawi and this is the time, the Supreme Court (SC) of Ghana joins them in finding a permanent solution to African electoral corruption.

I pray and hope that as the SC of Ghana strives to join Kenya and Malawi with the election petition before it, it should uphold the constitutional powers given to the pink sheet as the source document to resolving election disputes. Per their own admission, elections are won at the polling stations and the only legal evidence at the polling stations are the pink sheets.

As the SC hears the petition before it, it should base its judgment on law and remove all doubts that are surrounding the elections results. NPP’s Peter Mac Manu said on Joynews that John Mahama didn’t get the figure the EC mentioned for him. NDC has publicly come out to say, Nana Addo also didn’t get the figure the EC gave to him. The world is looking up to the SC to clear these doubts, and give Ghana a free and fair results.

As the SC listens to the petition, it should be guided by the fact that it’s integrity and respect are on the line. Africa is looking up to Ghana to join Kenya and Malawi to restore integrity in our judicial system. Africa is forever looking up to Ghana to restore the will of the people and jail the cheaters during Presidential elections. Kenya and Malawi took that bold step. Ghana can easily be the next country to do same. This is not a sophisticated call to the Justices of the Supreme Court.

As the SC listens to the petition before it, Ghana is considered the black star of Africa. This statement should not only be because of our independence but should also be because of our fair judicial system. This is why I say, it’s time for our Supreme Court to shine.
If the Supreme Court succeeds in joining Kenya and Malawi by restoring the will of the people, the pride of it will not only come to themselves, but to all Ghanaians, with me included. The world is watching.

Dr. Lawrence is the Founder of the Diaspora Progressive Movement in USA.

Supreme Court to rule on Amewu’s case tomorrow

The Supreme Court has set Tuesday, January 5, 2021, to rule on the case where the state is challenging an injunction placed on the gazetting and swearing-in of Member of Parliament-elect for the Hohoe constituency, John Peter Amewu.

The State through a Deputy Attorney General, Godfred Dame, filed a motion at the Supreme Court to fight the injunction placed on Amewu by the Ho High Court.
The injunction was granted after some residents of Santrokofi, Akpafu, Likpe, and Lolobi (SALL) argued that the Electoral Commission’s failure to allow them to vote in the just-ended parliamentary elections amounted to a breach of their rights.

They said, the creation of the Oti Region, coupled with a recent Supreme Court decision and failure of the EC to create a constituency for them, meant they did not vote for a parliamentary candidate in the just-ended election.

It is the case of the state that John Peter Amewu’s victory in the Hohoe parliamentary election was gazetted a day before the residents of SALL went to the High Court to place an injunction on the process.

The Deputy Attorney General, Godfred Dame further argued that the High Court in exercising its human rights oversight had no jurisdiction to grant the injunction as the SALL residents did not go through the proper procedure.

He further added that the residents of SALL do not belong to the Volta Region where the Hohoe constituency is found therefore cannot challenge the election of the Member of Parliament.

On the other hand, lawyers of the residents of SALL argued that the action by the Electoral Commission to deny their clients from voting in the parliamentary election in Hohoe is a breach of the fundamental human rights, administrative justice and the right to equality before the law.

The lead lawyer, Tsatsu Tsikata also challenged the constitutionality of the C.I. 128 arguing that it was not published on the right date as required by the Constitution.

Background

The Ho High Court on December 23, 2020, presided over by Justice George Buadi granted an interim injunction restraining the Electoral Commission from gazetting Mr. Amewu as the MP for Hohoe.

This followed an ex parte application filed by residents of the Guan District who were not given the opportunity to vote in parliamentary elections.

Eligible voters within areas in the newly created district; namely Santrokofi, Akpafu, Likpe, and Lolobi, were only allowed to take part in the presidential election on December 7, 2020, but could not vote in the parliamentary election because a constituency had not been created for them.

The applicants demanded the enforcement of their fundamental human right to vote.

What happened at Hohoe was criminal and inhumane – Franklin Kudjoe fumes

The founder and president of IMANI Africa, Franklin Kudjoe has indicated that the incident that brought John Peter Amewu to become Member of parliament elect of the Hohoe Constituency was criminal and inhumane.

Franklin, who is also a native of Lolobi said that what happened to SALL was inhumane and should not be encouraged.

He made this comment on his Facebook page on Monday, January 4, 2020.

”Truth be told, what happened in Hohoe is criminal and what happened to SALL is inhumane. No decent human being should be seen encouraging such.” He said.

Check This Out: Peki College of Education 2020/21 Staff recruitment announcement out – Apply Here

 

The incident

Explaining the incident, Franklin said Ballots were apparently printed for Santrokofi, Lolobi, Akpafu and Likpe to vote in Hohoe.

He continued, that on the eve of Dec 7, the EC through the connivance of vested interests issued the most barbaric order to these human beings not to vote.

He indicated that No decent human being anywhere in robes, wigs or suit should be seen encouraging such.

Check This Out:  NDC MPs present evidence of Election 2020 rigging to UK, US envoys

 

”Ballots were apparently printed for Santrokofi, Lolobi, Akpafu and Likpe to vote in Hohoe. Then on the eve of Dec 7, the EC through the connivance of vested interests issued the most barbaric order to these human beings not to vote. No decent human being anywhere in robes, wigs or suit should be seen encouraging such.”

HOHOE: FRANKLIN KUDJOE

John Amewu registers at Parliament despite court injunction on his membership

Member of Parliament(MP)-elect for the Hohoe constituency whose victory is in contention in court has been duly cleared and registered as part of Members Elect of the 8th Parliament of the 4th Republic.

The MP registration which started from 2nd January is expected to end on Wednesday the 6th of January, 2020 with swearing-in to take place on 7th January.

Checks by MyNewsGh.com from reliable sources inside parliament said Mr. Amewu was duly cleared to register as MP because parliament, through the clerk, has not been notified of any court injunction on the Hohoe MP.

Check This Out:  NDC MPs present evidence of Election 2020 rigging to UK, US envoys

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has today, January 4 as the day to hear legal arguments in a case that could potentially determine whether or not Energy Minister John Peter Amewu is sworn in as MP for Hohoe constituency on January 7.

There is currently in force an injunction granted by a Ho High court barring the EC from gazzeting Mr. Amewu as the winner of the polls.

This injunction was granted after some residents of Santrofi, Akpafu, Likpe and Lolobi argued that failure to vote in the just-ended parliamentary elections amounted to a breach of their rights.

 

Check This Out: Peki College of Education 2020/21 Staff recruitment announcement out – Apply Here

Some persons have argued that the appearance of Mr. Amewu to register means the Supreme Court verdict is a foregone conclusion to be favourable to him while others say the injunction didn’t bar him from the process.

So far about 150 members of the 8th parliament have registered and will he issued with the appropriate identification in due course.

Source: MyNewsGh.com

‘We never said we won the 2020 election’ – Dominic Ayine

0

”We never said that we won the election”, the main opposition National Democratic Congress’ Member of Parliament for Bolgatanga East, Dr Dominic Ayine has said, adding: “If we were convinced that we won this election, we would have stated that in the petition”.

The Deputy Attorney General in the erstwhile Mahama administration, who is also one of the nine legal spokespersons for the flagbearer of the NDC in the recently-held elections, Mr John Mahama, as far as the election petition is concerned, made the comment in an interview on GHOne TV on Thursday, 31 December 2020.

Check This Out: CCP Curriculum: BECE to be restructured; top changes in JHS,SHS Education in Ghana

He said the NDC, as a party, had, at all times, held the view that neither of the two leading candidates – President Nana Akufo-Addo nor former President John Mahama, got enough votes to cross the victory line in the recently-held election.

Mr Mahama filed a petition at the Supreme Court on Wednesday, 30 December 2020, to challenge the election results, which, according to him, were a “rigged” outcome.

Find below the reliefs being sought by Mr Mahama:

(a) A declaration that Mrs Jean Adukwei Mensa, Chairperson of [EC] and the Returning Officer for the Presidential Elections held on 7` December 2020 was in breach of Article 63(3) of the 1992 Constitution in the declaration she made on 9th December 2020 in respect of the Presidential Election that was held on 7th December 1020;

(b) A declaration that, based on the data contained in the declaration made by Mrs Jean Adukwei Mensa, Chairperson of [EC] and the Returning Officer for the Presidential Elections held on 7th December 2020, no candidate satisfied the requirement of Article 63(3) of the 1992 Constitution to be declared President-elect

(c) A declaration that the purported declaration made on 9th December 2020 of the results of the Presidential Election by Mrs Jean Adukwel Mensa, Chairperson of Respondent and the Returning Officer for the Presidential Elections held on 7″ December 2020, is unconstitutional, null and void and of no effect whatsoever;

Check This Out:  NDC MPs present evidence of Election 2020 rigging to UK,US envoys

(d) An order annulling the Declaration of President-Elect Instrument, 2020 (C.1. 130) dated 9th December 2020, issued under the hand of Mrs Jean Adukwel Mensa, Chairperson of the [EC] and the Returning Officer for the Presidential Elections held 7′ December 2020 and gazetted on 10th December 2020;

(e) An order of injunction restraining [President Akufo-Addo] from holding himself out as President-elect;

(f) An order of mandatory injunction directing the [EC] to proceed to conduct a second election with Petitioner and [Nana Akufo-Addo] as the candidates as required under Articles 63(4) and (5) of the 1992 Constitution.

In a later address after the filing of the petition, Mr Mahama explained why he decided not to concede.

Read his full reasons below:

STANDING ON PRINCIPLE

AN ADDRESS BY HE JOHN DRAMANI MAHAMA, PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE

OF THE NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS

Wednesday 30th December 2020

Good evening ladies and gentlemen, fellow Ghanaians, my Brothers and Sisters. Let me begin by wishing you all Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year.

I am speaking to you, my countrymen and women, today because I would like to address a few of the issues that have come up since the December 7 election, particularly the issue of how best to proceed—for me, as a candidate; and, I believe, for us, as a nation.

Increasingly, many of us who are attempting to understand how the Electoral Commission arrived at the results of this last election are being advised to forgo the issue—in the interest of peace.

We are being reminded that Ghanaians are a peace-loving people and that Ghana, unlike many other nations on our dear continent of Africa, has not succumbed to war or been plagued with violence.

As a former president of the Republic of Ghana, a country that I love dearly, I am here to assure you that I know what it is to act in the interest of peace.

I have always done so without reservation or hesitation.

I know what it is to contest an election, and to have the good people of this country choose my opponent to serve as their next president. I know what it is to concede. I have done so before. In 2016 when the election was not called in my favour, I conceded. I conceded in a congratulatory call to my opponent. And then, not long after that, I conceded in a public address to the good people of Ghana.

I conceded not simply in the interest of peace and democracy, but because I respect the will of the people. I did then, and I do now.

So, when I say that I will not concede this election, please know that I have not taken this decision lightly; understand that it is not because of a desire for power, but because of a dedication to principle and a commitment to democracy.

Based on the irregular and inconsistent results that were reported, I have reason to doubt that this election was free, or fair, or transparent. And without those fundamental pillars in place, how can any of us be sure that the results announced truly represent the will of the people?

My Brothers and Sisters, I stand here today to remind you that Ghana is a peaceful nation precisely because Ghanaians have always stood on principle. We have always fought for our democracy.

Our forefathers and foremothers have always understood that without this basic foundation, whatever peace exists in our country will not be lasting; whatever liberation we have as the architects of our collective future will soon be lost.

Whenever we decide to take the easiest road, the first step is always surrender. And, often, the thing that we lose is the very thing that we value the most.

The freedom that we enjoy today was not given on a silver platter. It came at a price. It came because our forefathers and mothers stood on principle. Our history books are filled with the names of individuals who refused to take the road that was the easiest, or safest, or most convenient.

They refused to surrender their ability to appeal for justice in a land where they were meant to have a voice and use it for the betterment of themselves and their children and future generations.

All who fought for independence stood on principle to demand the sovereignty of this land that belongs to us, the people of Ghana.

Indeed, Dr. Kwame Nkrumah once said, “Those who would judge us merely by the heights we have achieved would do well to remember the depths from which we started.”

There are many of you who are listening to me this evening who have spent your entire lives knowing only democracy. You know a Ghana in which every four years the citizens go to the ballot box to exercise their right to choose leaders who they believe will best serve their interests.

You know a Ghana in which the baton of power has been passed graciously, and without incident, from one party to another; a country with hundreds of radio stations and dozens of newspapers; a country where citizens can openly critique the performance of their elected officials; a country where they can protest peacefully, and without fear of punishment.

It is the Ghana that your mothers and fathers, your grandmothers and grandfathers—wanted you to know. It is the Ghana that they dreamed of, and some even died trying to make that dream a reality.

Also listening tonight are many of you who remember a different Ghana. In that Ghana, most, if not all, of those political traditions and social liberties I spoke of earlier did not exist: the airwaves were not filled with radio stations; there were not numerous newspapers; people held their peace because to complain about the people in power was to risk all manner of reprisals.

In that Ghana, presidential terms were interrupted by coups, and former heads of state were executed. There was kalabule, and Operation Feed Yourself, not to mention years of hunger, bushfires, drought, and one economic recovery programme after another.

Even the Ghana of the Kume Preko demonstrations bear little resemblance to the Ghana of today.

We have travelled quite far as a nation in such a short period of time.

The road has not been easy, nor has it been absent of obstacles. That is why our beloved nation, Ghana, is often referred to as a trailblazer on the African continent.

With each achievement, we have grown stronger—as a people, and as a nation.

Through these trials and tribulations, our democracy has also been strengthened.

My Brothers and Sisters, in a democracy as strong as ours, peace and justice can—and, in fact, they usually do—coexist. And that is because in a democracy such as the one we have built in Ghana; it is the people who hold the power.

Indeed, in 2012 when the election was called in my favour, my opponent challenged the results—as was his right; and he took the matter to court. Eight long months of an election petition, far from destroying our democracy, rather reinforced our commitment to it—and affirmed the strength of our institutions, particularly the judiciary.

It is only in governments where the people are powerless, and at the mercy of those who hold office, that peace—or at least what passes as peace—can exist without justice.

Some people have asked me what I hope to gain by challenging the results of this election.

Let me tell you: I want, perhaps, the very same thing that my opponent wanted when in 2012 he challenged the results of that election; I want the removal of doubt. I want for all of us to know that our elections should be free, fair, and safe—and that we do not have to settle for a process that leaves us confused, and with more questions than answers.

I want a Ghana where institutions of state can be held to account. Where we can stand on principle and demand transparency without the risk of losing our lives.

When people lose their lives—as seven people did—in the course of our elections, we are moving backwards not forward; we are unravelling the very fabric of our democracy; we are risking the loss of three decades worth of progress.

When today we see armed military and militia in our collation centres and election outcomes declared at the point of a gun, for us who have witnessed our country’s journey through all its post-independence travails, we wonder if we have truly exorcised the ghosts of our torturous past.

We must continue to be a nation in which our young citizens have faith in our institutions, trust the rule of law, and rely on the presence of peace because there is justice.

Ghana must be a country where we citizens know and believe, without any doubt whatsoever, that the way forward is determined by the will of the Ghanaian people. And that we can hold our institutions of state accountable and guarantee that they work in favour of the national interest and not in the interest of the administration or person in power.

That is what I want.

This is why earlier today, my lawyers filed a petition in the Supreme Court of Ghana challenging the declaration of the results of the December 7, 2020 Presidential Election made by Mrs. Jean Mensa, the Chairperson of the Electoral Commission.

I have been compelled to do this because of her clear failure to act in accordance with the Constitution.

I thank you for your kind attention.

May your New Year be one of good health and prosperity.

May God bless each of you, and may God continue to bless our homeland, Ghana.

Source: ClassFMonline.com

State charges 20 Minority MPs for marching to EC Headquarters

The State, through the Ghana Police Service, has charged 20 Minority MPs with unlawful assembly after they marched to the head office of the Electoral Commission in Accra on Tuesday, 22 December 2020.

The MPs include Haruna Iddrisu, Mohammed Mubarak Muntaka, Samuel George, John Abdulai Jinapor and Rockson Defiamekpor.

The others are Ras Mubarak, Mutawakilu Adam, Ebenezer Okletey Terlabi, Dr. Kwabena Donkor, A.B. Fuseini, Kwabena Minta Akando, Yusif Issaka Jaja and Isaac Adongo.

The rest include Emmanuel Armah Kofi Buah, James Klutse Avedzi, James Agalga, Collins Dauda, Abdul Rashi Pelpuo, Richard Quashigah and Zanetor Agyeman-Rawlings.

Apart from them, the police also charged Mr Peter Boamah Otokunor, a deputy General Secretary of the main opposition National Democratic Congress with the same offence.

The police has taken issue with them for failing to pre-inform the law enforcement body ahead of the march.

A statement of offence said the MPs unlawfully assembled and conducted themselves in “a manner likely to cause persons in the neighbourhood reasonable fear where a breach of the peace is likely to be occasioned.”

Check This Out:  NDC MPs present evidence of Election 2020 rigging to UK, US envoys

There was a near-violent standoff between the Minority Caucus in Parliament and about 100 heavily armed riot police officers on the day of the march, as the lawmakers tried forcing their way into the headquarters of the Electoral Commission, which is about a kilometre from the Office of Parliament, to present their petition to the election management body concerning the election results declared for the Techiman South constituency after the recently-held general elections.

The MPs were mostly clad in black and kept daring the armed police officers to “shoot us” and “kill us”.

 

The police said the MPs needed to have served notice of their protest in accordance with the Public Order Act but the MPs said they were just taking a walk.

The protest march by the Minority Caucus followed several pockets of demonstration across the country by members of the main opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC) against the Electoral Commission and its management, who they have accused of stealing victory for the incumbent.

Out of the 13,119,460 total valid votes cast, President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) polled 6,730,587 votes representing 51.302 per cent.

His closest contender, former President John Mahama of the NDC, polled 6,213,182 representing 47.359 per cent.

Check This Out: Peki College of Education 2020/21 Staff recruitment announcement out – Apply Here

Both the NDC and NPP have 137 seats in Parliament. There is one independent MP, who has sided with the NPP, from which he had run solo in the recent polls.

Source: ClassFMonline.com

MP